Friday, October 19, 2012

Wendy's New Logo

By now, a lot of people are aware of Wendy's new logo which was released just a few days ago.

It would seem that a lot of brands have changed their logos (e.g. Ebay) this year, and Wendy's happened to join that same bandwagon.

Overall, I am not liking the Wendy's logo that much. Just a quick rundown of my thoughts and ideas on their new logo:
1) I do like their updating the image of Wendy as a more modern-looking girl. It makes it feel more relevant
2) The font face for "Wendy's" makes it look like it's a fake Wendy's. 
3) Is minimalist the new trend for logos? It would appear as such. I can imagine the process behind this logo: "Need a new logo--sure, let's keep everything clean and simple. Ta-dah, this is going to be the perfect new logo." Oh please. I don't see the relevance of the logo to the brand. Does it emulate what Wendy's means to its market today? I don't think so.

For a new logo, Wendy's could've done it better. 
See my post on how new logos could be judged: http://marketerette.blogspot.com/2012/09/new-logo-anyone.html

And here's Wendy's new logo vis-a-vis its previous one:


Photo taken from: http://global.fncstatic.com/static/managed/img/fn2/travel/WendysNewLogo.jpg


Saturday, October 13, 2012

Creative Agency vs. Client-side

I like to think of how fortunate I am to have worked in a creative agency in the past. Today, I am considered a client as I currently work as part of the marketing department for an FMCG company. No doubt, I've had the best of both worlds in that sense. As soon as I graduated from college, I was excited to start my career--applying left and right to agencies and brand-related job openings. As a student, I just knew in my heart that I love brands. And I wanted to follow that.

So am I happier as a client or in agency? Definitely, these two are different. Each has its own pros and cons, and I'm pretty sure a lot of college students are wondering which path to take. In this post, I'll be sharing what I think of working in an agency and as a client. Just a caveat though: these are all taken from my work experience, and nothing is really the same for everyone.

  • TIME


THE AGENCY SIDE
In working in an agency, time is of the essence. Needless to say, agencies can't live without their clients (whether it's a big agency or not, they need their clients). So it's important we meet client deadlines. There are times when the client would give us very limited time to accomplish a task--and let's face it, brilliant ideas don't just happen overnight. Agencies have to work with whatever time the client gives them. If there's a pitch or presentation, we have to work within their time frame. When dealing with any client deliverable, my Managing Director would joke, "Russian or Argentinian?" (which sounds in Filipino as "Rush yan or Urgent Din Yan?"; translated in English: "Is this Rush or Urgent?").

And yet, Agencies have no sense of time. How so? Work also includes the weekends; Holidays here in Manila are pointless for agencies. Rather, these supposed holidays tend to be days for finishing materials. At times, our Creative Team together with Strat. Planners (see my next article on the basic structure of agencies) would stay overnight working on a project. I recall vividly how our Creative Director and members of his Creative Team would come to work after lunch. Or worse, leave work after lunch. Or worst of all, leave the office after 3 consecutive nights working in the office. It's no wonder some would come to work wearing dark-colored shades and our constant reliance on coffee.

THE CLIENT SIDE
For Clients, especially into FMCG, time is important. For FMCGs, it's critical to get our finished goods in trade on time, which is why we are always wary of meeting deadlines--such as budget approvals, finalize artworks, mock-ups, color approval, pre-production, production, pipeline to distributors and more. Any delay has a domino effect--it affects other departments, other deadlines and ultimately, our entire plan for the brand.
Clients can manage their time better. Clients work under the usual work hours--say, 8:30 am to 5:30 pm--unlike agencies. Lunch time is typically an hour, so you can expect clients to be unreachable clients from 12-1 pm.

  • WORK ENVIRONMENT


THE AGENCY SIDE
I find that nothing beats the office of creative agencies. They're meant to be conducive for creativity and inspiration, which is why it's meant to be fun. Obviously, it's stylish. In the agency I worked for, not only were the office furniture stylish but also expensively stylish--as in, Philippe Starck furniture. Admittedly, in spite of our seats being expensive and stylish, it did not feel entirely ergonomic. In the end, the atmosphere is--for most agencies I've been to--fun, playful and comfortable. We had our own game area, a sleeping area and more! It practically feels like home, especially with our kitchen. And you may or may not notice this if you've been to an agency office, but they always have a shower.

THE CLIENT SIDE
Client offices are typical--it's designed to be utilitarian and simplistic. Most, if not all, have a so-called "War Room" (thanks to Sun Tzu's infamous "Art of War"), and you can expect a boardroom or two. Seats are comfortable, and you will find the usual cubicle and office desk set-up. Somehow, the environment feels very rigid and stiff if not for a co-worker cracking up a joke.


  • ATTIRE


THE AGENCY SIDE
Without a doubt, personal fashion and style are embraced in agencies. Casual attire can be acceptable. Especially for those working in the Creative Team, you are free to dress in whichever way you want. Of course, when meeting clients they do have to be a bit more professional. In the confines of their office, however, they are free to wear whatever they want, be it slippers, shirt, jeans, etc.--as long as their superiors are alright by it.

THE CLIENT SIDE
Clients are obviously dressed in business attire. Here in Manila, it's acceptable for men to wear polo and slacks. No one really wears a necktie or suit unless mandated by their company. As for ladies, we typically wear skirt or slacks, high-heeled shoes or closed flats, and a decent blouse or polo. You can be fashionable even in business attire, but only to a certain extent as showing too much skin is unacceptable. On the one hand, some companies do have their own office attire. Take for instance, with my current employer in which we are supposed to wear our Company Shirts on Mondays and Fridays.

  • BRANDS MANAGEMENT VS. BRAND MANAGEMENT


THE AGENCY SIDE
Agencies handle multiple brands. If you really want to have experience handling multiple brands, agency would be the best way to go. You all have access to the multiple brands handled by your agency. Big agencies such as Ogilvy and McCann have their own compilation of case studies for brands they've handled. It's only made privy to current members of their company though. The more global the agency, the more access you have for information that can help you better make decisions (for Planners, that is).

THE CLIENT SIDE
As far as being a client goes, if you're a manager for a brand then that's all there is. Of course, it's a different matter altogether if you're a Marketing Director handling multiple brand managers (and thus, different brands). But you get the picture--you only see as far as what you have. Your only source of information in making choices would be the data given by research agencies, your knowledge of handling other brands in the past, and your gut-feel. If your team handles Brand X, then expect the rest of your days constantly working on Brand X.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

So in the end, is one better than the other? What's interesting is that agencies are quite the opposite of client-side, as I'm sure you've found above. In pursuing your career path, it would be best if you already know what you want from the start--whether agency or client. But it's not too late to make that switch if you feel like you could do better somewhere else. I've done that, and I have no regrets. There are times I miss being in an agency, but I find personal fulfillment being in the client-side. It's that simple for me.


Monday, October 1, 2012

Packaging Matters

ALL MATERIALS SHOULD BE COHESIVE.

Having joined a creative agency prior to my current line of work, it was important for us to ensure that every medium and collateral is in line with our overall campaign for any brand. That's what creative agencies are for, anyway. We plan and execute the campaign--from above-the-line to below-the-line efforts and corporate materials.

It was only recently that Colgate started airing their new Colgate Slim Soft toothbrush in local primetime slots. What's interesting about Colgate's new toothbrush is its product proposition of 0.01mm bristles that deeply clean below the gum line as compared to their previous version.

But what makes the new Colgate Slim Soft cleverly executed is its packaging.

Sure, the TV Commercial (TVC) clearly communicates its unique selling proposition--even with the usual Colgate toothbrush TVC format. But even more, the packaging makes it all the more clever: its blister packaging is purposely designed to look like a "1". Yes, you read it right. It looks like the number one. It's a clever way of stressing the point that it has a very thin bristle, but even greater, it was cleverly executed in the TVC that it looks like the number 1 toothbrush (aside from the fact that Colgate is supposedly the number one recommend brand by dentists).

Having been part of a creative agency, it is fantastic to see the elements across all materials communicating one clear and single proposition. After all, that's what agencies should attain. And I find that Colgate's new toothbrush was able to do it with its TVC and not-so-usual packaging.

Granted, it might have been better if they had more point-of-purchase (POP) materials to communicate their proposition. Say, a tactical bin that is shaped like a "1"? I wasn't able to see any POP material for it in any supermarket so far, so they could have done something in that area. Th

Here is Colgate's Slim Soft Toothbrush's TVC:


Wednesday, September 26, 2012

New logo, anyone?


For web-savvy people, it may come as a surprise to find that ebay has recently changed its logo, as you will find on this page. According to the news, ebay's new logo (after 17 years in the industry) depicts its new image as an innovative brand. In fact, one of their big executives shares that the logo reflects eBay's current direction as "a global online marketplace that offers a cleaner, more contemporary and consistent experience."
What do you think of their new logo? This is how I would judge their new logo:
  1.  Does it reflect their new brand direction? Comparing their previous logo with the new one, I find that it definitely reflects ebay's new direction--and it's great that they still decided to retain the ebay colors (ebay would not be ebay without those colors). They wanted to portray cleaner and contemporary? Check and check. They nailed it in the sense that it's literally cleaner and pleasing to the eyes. As for contemporary, minimalism seems to be the new contemporary at this day and age.
  2. Does it stand out against competition? In the global scene, Ebay has Amazon. Here in Manila, there's Sulit.com.ph and ayosdito.ph. Without a doubt, ebay has long established its equity in the market so it would not seem as a problem. But consider the following brand logos: Google and Microsoft. Somehow, the new ebay logo reminds me highly of these two logos.
  3. Is it creative? Memorable? I'm pretty sure agencies and creative people from everywhere would greatly ridicule ebay's new logo. I don't think one needs to be from a creative agency to say that it is in no way creative. They changed the typeface. They adjusted the kerning. It's as simple as that. Anyone could think of doing this. As far as creativity matters, ebay didn't nail this one.
Overall, ebay's logo addressed its immediate need to communicate its new direction. Not to mention, it surely created a lot of web buzz among critics such as myself--and that's effective PR and free advertising (a treat for any marketer, really). Regardless, ebay will always be ebay.
Here in the Philippines, I have yet to discover a brand who will change its logo to the effect of ebay. Granted, there have been brands such as Jollibee who simply took away its brand name (but that's too conservative of a logo change). It would make sense why that's the case especially with local brands in the country. After all, local brands here in Manila are relatively new compared to the multinationals--these brands have not reached that point to make a huge shift in brand direction to do such a feat.
Ebay's new logo, released on September 2012.
Image
Photo taken from: http://assets.creativity-online.com/images/work/large/e/b/a/eBay_NewLogoComparison12.jpg

Coffee crazy!


DO YOU LOVE INSTANT COFFEE?

Kopiko Brown Sugar & Nescafe's Brown N' Creamy
I recall that around 2 years ago, Kopiko has just started to penetrate the market in the Philippines. For a time, it was known here solely for its coffee-flavored candy. When its instant coffee was introduced in the market, it had no above-the-line (ATL) advertising whatsoever. Today, however, Kopiko has taken up a significant share of leading instant coffee brands in the country with its first variant--Kopiko Brown Sugar.



What made Kopiko such a success in the country? With minimal advertising, it mainly gone up the market through word-of-mouth. Admittedly, I have been a follower and an ambassador of the brand ever since it was introduced to me by a former boss. True enough, the product in itself generates its own advertising (where would we marketers be if this were the case in general?) with its creamy, sweet flavor. In fact, it is even priced lower than leading coffee brands. It would be obvious, then, for Kopiko to have other brands going head-on for the battle of market shares.

Brands such as Nescafe, for instance, have developed their own instant coffee flavors that can directly compete with Kopiko's Brown Sugar variant.They have recently developed Nescafe Chocolatey Coffee, Creamy White Coffee, and Brown N' Creamy variants. Interestingly enough, these flavors are "Especially made for Filipinos." After tasting these myself, these variants do have the same appeal in taste as with Kopiko. It makes me wonder... what variant will they think of next? Right now, Kopiko is advertising its new Koppiccino variant which has a very interesting proposition of an instant cappuccino experience. So, what more can we expect Nescafe to come out with? Coffee lovers here in Manila have something to look forward to.

Speaking of Nescafe, I'm definitely sick of hearing their endorser--Coco Martin, one of Manila's sought-after celebrities--saying "Mas yAmmy." (translation: More yummy!) I believe they intentionally made him say "yAmmy" instead of the proper pronunciation  which is "yummy". I doubt Coco Martin has bad pronunciation skills, and I doubt Nescafe's agency--Publicis Manila--would let such an error air on TV unless they intended it. Either way, it's already annoying that this TVC is being replayed over and over again in primetime spots. But to hear him say "Mas yAmmy" is pretty much like listening to someone raking a chalkboard each time he says it.
If you're interested in seeing the commercial, you can preview the video here or watch it by clicking this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n20QaL8f5c

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n20QaL8f5c]
----
Disclaimer: Photo taken from http://i54.tinypic.com/21llogi.jpg.